New Year, Old Year: 2019 Revisited

Day Two! The Aesthetes!

What I Got Right!

This one is fifty-fifty. But it’s with some perverse pleasure that I note that the good ones were at least all clustered at the top of the list.

The big success story here is Era: Medieval Age, which I liked enough to review its expansion by individually ranking every building in the game. Yes, this was a nerdy thing to do. Yes, it took a long time. Yes, I deeply regretted the decision halfway through, but figured the only way to survive was by eating my way through to the other side. It was out of love that I persevered, because Era remains one of the most-played non-new games in my collection.

The same is true of Cartographers, although for an entirely different reason. When the game released as an app, it became my go-to “potty game.” Which may sound like TMI, but it serves to (a) tell you a little bit about me, and (b) point out that when there’s no need to draw everything by hand or count up spaces during scoring, Cartographers takes only six and a half minutes to completion.

Meanwhile, Mr. Cabbagehead’s Garden is still a delightful little thing. The game’s persnickety scoring is more of a sticking point than it was originally, but that’s a minor point compared to how easy it is to set up and play for a few minutes.

What I Got Wrong!

These sting ever so slightly.

Just looking at Moon Base makes me want to revisit it. It’s still here, in a box in the basement. But it only took a few plays at the beginning of the year to realize I wanted it to do more than look pretty and sport some above-average drafting and placement. The ideal solutions were a little too tidy, too predictable. Damn, but it looks good. Maybe that’s why it was on this list in the first place.

The others aren’t quite as hard to swallow. Ecos: First Continent is probably the strongest of this list’s three regrets, but I’m still waiting to hear if there will be more to this system or what, because while the tile-drawing portion of the game was nearly perfect, the finite combos in the deck began to wear thin. Red Alert hasn’t reappeared for a very different reason: it’s just so much. All those little ships, barely distinguishable when I haven’t played for a while. All those little stands, many of which have invariably separated from the ships during storage. All the little rules that don’t feel intuitive the way more terrestrial Commands & Colors titles manage. I know what a forest does. Asteroids and planets? I get the gist, but not as immediately. Add in a bunch of extras, and Red Alert becomes one of those games that requires more energy than I’m willing to give it.

On page three, we’re telling a story about the games that told a story.

Posted on February 25, 2021, in Board Game and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink. 20 Comments.

  1. Sadly, Unmatched kind of fell flat for us. Just ended up feeling shallow and anti-climatic in all of our games following the 1st time we played (The first play seemed very promising).

    Beautiful package though.

  2. Surprised to hear Unmatched fell flat. I thought the game nailed the cliche “simple with a lot of depth” we throw around so easily. I thought it did a particularly good job of forcing actual maneuver. Rarely do my games turn into slugfests, but instead are very drawn out with timed attrition of mobs and a focus on pinning my opponent. This may just be because my son plays as Robin Hood who feels slightly overpowered and really forces opponents to move a lot. I’d also advise against using King Arthur. He’s mechanically the most simple which I think forces players to mindlessly attack and makes him a weak character also. Both Robin v Bigfoot and Bruce Lee are excellent cheaper expansions that add a lot to the game IMO that might be worth trying before you write it off. The raptors are useless. Cobble and Fog is indeed sublime and adds just enough complexity without becoming onerous to really elevate this above a simple skirmish game. Of course it’s a more expensive expansion so may not be worth it if you’re on the fence.

    Sorry for wall of text. Passionate about this game.

    • The later boxes certainly help Unmatched come into its own, though. I can see how someone would find it dull if they only played the original box.

    • (answering as anonymous; forgot to put my details in):

      I feel like if I were to try and pinpoint exactly where it kind of fell short is in how the nuance in the strategy/tactics relies on hidden info in the deck. It’s probably just a matter of taste, but somewhere in the
      “My hand’s crap! run away. Still crap? keep running away”
      “I play this, you cancel it. You play that, I cancel it –> Eventually someone hits or gets put on the run again”
      and the limitation of 2 units per team ended up giving me this feeling of having too much maneuverability? or too little friction? don’t know what the best term here would be.

      And what of course offsets this (i assume) is that keenness to examine the decks and keep track of the distribution of cards; “where’s that medussa’s gaze card?” or “where’s that big sniping card of robin hood?”, etc. But just couldn’t get excited about doing so.

      While I sense that this would be the thing that glues that card play and board maneuvering into that paradigm that fans of the game love about it, we just didn’t get the inspiration to do that while playing.

      I guess it doesn’t help that I’ve been spoiled by the other 30 keepers that I’ve collected so far. Probably just not my type of game (Was kind of hoping it’d scratch an itch for a Wiz-War lite or something)

  3. Wow, I didn’t expect you to like Pax Transhumanity. My first play of it put me off so much I just discared the game. It felt so unthematic,you were just trying to assemble the right colors.

    Maybe it’s time to give it another shot and try to see past that.

    By the way, any opinions on Pax Viking? And did you know we have another Pax incoming? It’s called Pax Shamiram and we have absolutely no information on it, but apparently that’s a thing.

    • Pax Viking is good! I have an early copy, and we’ve enjoyed our plays. It feels much more Pax-ish than expected. It’s less conceptual than the other titles, though. Feels more straightforward. Less wacky. Less controversial as well, perhaps.

      First I’m hearing about Pax Shamiram. I know one or two other designers are considering their own takes on the Pax system. Hopefully we’ll see it continue to grow in interesting ways.

  4. I eagerly bought Dune but always hesitate to bring it back out because there always is an argument about the rules, and it almost seems the way the Emperor is written intentionally forces you to make a house rule on his ability.

  5. I admire your bravery in saying you like an Eklund design at this point. I haven’t had a chance to play Pax Transhumanity yet, but I wouldn’t mind trying it. It sounds really crunchy.

    • Eklund still has a good mind for interesting systems, he has just always had garbage opinions

    • That’s kind of you to say, Dave! I’m not sure I’d call it “brave,” though. For one thing, Pax Transhumanity was designed by the Other Eklund. For another… I don’t really care if somebody doesn’t want me to play a game. Anyway, Eklund’s games are odd. They don’t generally argue what his footnotes say they argue. Which is a whole topic I’ve considered writing about many times before, but might never get around to.

      • Of course I’d read that article, but of course it helps to incorporate other designers so we’re not just designating one as our punching bag.

        I’m reminded again of the easily missed introduction in Archipelago’s rulebook that says “The mission is meant to be one of peace… Such a balance can only be achieved through each player’s commitment to make the archipelago a happy and productive colony.” but the game aptly demonstrates how violence can happen without the use of arms.

      • I’m glad that you take that stance, Dan. Shows integrity.

        And yeah, sorry I didn’t realize it was designed by the Other Eklund (tm?). Talking about the footnotes made me think of the first.

        I would read that article if you ever do write it!

      • Triskelli, exactly. I was more wont to write such an article before Eklund’s recent… social media moment? Implosion? Whatever we want to call it, I have no desire to write a piece that could be considered part of a pile-on. I’d do something comparative, but that requires a parallel game to consider. Frankly, Eklund is working in such a niche space that there aren’t as many parallels as I’d like there to be.

      • Dave, ha, yeah, you are definitely not the first person to mix up those two. The footnotes make them especially difficult to separate.

  6. For Sabotage, would you now say it’s not the best of the Fowers catalogue, where in your original review it was a “might be”? And are you even more hesitant to recommend it now?
    I’ve been on a bit of a Fowers kick (Now Boarding and Hardback, awaiting Burgle Bros 2), and the premise/mechanics of Sabotage really interest me.

    Really appreciate your written reviews, as I always find it a lot easier to read an article than watching a 20-30 minute video.

    • I still really love Sabotage! It just wants those caveats: it’s hard to teach, it’s persnickety, and it’s best with exactly four players.

      As for where it falls in Fowers’ oeuvre, I’d put it at number two, right under Burgle Bros 2: The Casino Capers.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

<span>%d</span> bloggers like this: