Gargling Brack

Poll: For April Fool's Day, should I publish an article entitled "Foucault in the Sea," about the Foucauldian assumptions behind Ahoy, except make it totally serious?

At some point the board game industry’s collective designers are going to stage a riot if we keep saying “It’s no Root.”

So let’s set that aside for now. Despite being published by Leder Games, illustrated by the inimitable Kyle Ferrin, and featuring four (mostly) asymmetrical factions of anthropomorphic animals fighting for control of its seascape — and despite some vaguely philosophical undertones — Greg Loring-Albright’s Ahoy is very much its own beast.

For one thing, it isn’t a hit.

Nor have these pirates. They mostly stick around these parts.

Ever traveled the seven seas?

Which isn’t to say there isn’t anything appealing about Ahoy. Right off the bat, it puts itself across as a lighter asymmetrical game. Unlike the game I promised I wouldn’t invoke and more recent fare like Vast: The Mysterious Manor, Crescent Moon, and Circadians: Chaos Order, the asymmetry here isn’t such a tall barrier to entry. To be sure, there’s a significant difference between “lighter” and “light,” and newcomers may still find themselves scared off by the abundance of little rules and distinctions, but for the most part Ahoy is a beer-and-pretzels affair, suitable for its breeziness if not its depth of play.

Like everything else touched by Kyle Ferrin’s pen and Leder’s development team, it’s an attractive fantasy. Starting with only two islands and growing to encompass many more, it presents a simple ecosystem of intersecting interests. The sharks of this pond are the Bluefin Squadron, and not only because they’re literal sharks. The Squadron quickly establishes itself as the game’s heavy hitter: its flagship deposits patrols in its wake, commands significant muscle in combat, and can lock off entire islands with strongholds. “Toothy” is a good word for them: the Squadron is abundant, aggressive, and initially seems unbeatable.

The Mollusk Union offers a more hopeful outlook. Like the Squadron, they too spend much of their time traveling the seas and dropping off passengers. “Comrades,” they’re called, a nod to the Union’s more labor-friendly outlook — and perhaps an acknowledgement of Loring-Albright’s disposition as well. Unlike patrols, comrades aren’t here to fight. They’re infiltrators, agitators, workers on the ground. When the time is right, sudden uprisings may cripple their opposition. Until then, the Union prepares the archipelago with the seeds of revolution.

The conflict between these two factions sets the backdrop. Their goal is raw control: patrols versus comrades, opposing flagships with cannons at the ready, naked aggression ready to quash dissatisfied rumblings and vice versa. But Ahoy doesn’t stop there. Where most designers would present the parameters of their conflict in isolation, Loring-Albright takes one more step. There’s a third side to this conflict, and potentially a fourth: the Smuggler. These rapscallions venture between the battle lines, dodging patrols and flagships, or perhaps, at times, supplying them.

This game is ripe for theorycrafting. Could there have been a fourth faction, preferably one that counterbalanced the Smuggler?

Three of Ahoy’s four factions are unique.

This does some heavy lifting, both thematically and to further Ahoy’s race toward completion. When a Smuggler delivers cargo to an island, that island’s prosperity die ticks up a digit. From now on, that island is worth an extra point at the end of the round. Over time, islands blessed with centralized locations or favorable trade winds — or even something as simple as an absence of hostile vessels — become desirable havens, earning as many points all at once as a player might have expected from a half-dozen opening rounds. There’s real tension to be found in how the Smugglers are both essential to the archipelago’s ecosystem and parasitic of the great powers struggling for its fealty. Consider this chain of knock-on effects: the Bluefin Squadron often peaks early when it deploys all its patrols; to reclaim some manpower, it converts clusters of patrols into strongholds; strongholds always spark battle with any visiting ships; wise Smugglers are more interested in moving wares than loading cannons, so they avoid fortified islands; now the very same islands the Squadron fortified will never grow in value. Militarization has stifled that island’s ability to develop. That’s a beautiful piece of gamifying an economic statement if I’ve ever seen one.

That tension disappears entirely when Ahoy is played with two players. Instead, the Squadron and Union alternate which side gets to increase an island’s prosperity. It’s a bland solution, not to mention antithetical to the whole point of including the Smugglers in the first place. There’s nothing to stop the Squadron from increasing the prosperity of a fortified island. Nor, really, is there any sense that this ecosystem operates as anything other than a straightforward contest of manpower and maneuvers. Sadly, as an area control game it’s too anemic to bother with. It needs that third party.

Which makes it all the more disappointing that the Smugglers, despite being two of the game’s four factions, don’t offer much excitement. Where the Bluefin Squadron and Mollusk Union function at two levels, offering both a tactical movement game with their flagship and an area control game with their subordinates, the Smugglers are left with crumbs. To some degree that’s the point. They are, after all, the small folk who operate in the margins left by the greater powers. But it’s thin stuff, leaving them little to do but chart routes. Sure, they can try to influence the outcome of the wider war. Every time they deliver a crate, the Smuggler slides it under one of two cards, covertly signifying which side they supplied to win a particular type of island. When the final tally is counted, these wagers are worth spills of points, often tipping the entire conflict into their favor. But when the other great power comes along and seizes an island earmarked for their opposition, the solution to a bad bet isn’t to load the cannons, sail over to that island, and help the losing side retake it. It’s to place more bets.

The result is a game that feels markedly lopsided. In two respects, really. First, the Smugglers are essential but tedious, elevating Ahoy’s gameplay and commentary alike, but not providing much enjoyment in their own right. Second, they operate best when there are two of them in competition to prevent one Smuggler from having the run of the market. Except the presence of a rival is a downer for the first Smuggler, wares regularly sniped out from under you, making it all the harder to chart routes with any forethought. It doesn’t help that the deck is shallow enough that every session with four players saw it run dry prematurely, robbing Smugglers of much to do on their final turn or two but pick fights.

It’s a real pickle. And it means that Ahoy is never quite its best self.


As ever, Kyle Ferrin’s whimsical edge is a highlight.

I don’t want to be ungenerous toward Loring-Albright or one of the most talented development teams working right now, but Ahoy lacks shine. Like many of the titles from Leder, it clearly has big ideas on its mind. Asymmetrical design is always a challenge to begin with, and that goes double when players are asked to stand in for opposing game systems and economic concepts.

But while pirates may have afforded diminished priority to TLC, board game designers cannot. Ahoy could have been much more.


(If what I’m doing at Space-Biff! is valuable to you in some way, please consider dropping by my Patreon campaign or Ko-fi.)

A complimentary copy was provided.

Posted on October 3, 2022, in Board Game and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink. 15 Comments.

  1. The reviewer clearly does not like Ahoy which is fine – each to his or her own. I have played it 10x and enjoyed it as the Bluefin Squadron, Mollusk Union and as Smugglers. There was a lot left out of this review but perhaps space was an issue.

  2. Looking forward to “asymmetry” running its course. As far as I’m concerned its drawbacks outweigh its benefits.

    • Definitely agree with that sentiment, and while I haven’t played Ahoy yet, I think that statement gets to the core concerns I have with it. If the drawbacks typically outweigh the benefits in asymmetrical games, what benefits remain when you strip it down this much?

      Still excited to give the game a try, but this review definitely reinforces concerns I already had from reading the rules and watching a playthrough.

      • At this point “Asym” is nearly a showstopper for me. I don’t want to play a different game from everyone else, in a game where I spend all my time in learning mode because everyone changes factions each time. My group is pretty omnivorous, so with us only getting back to any title once every three months or so a game like this or like (the game that shall not be named in this article) the learning curve just to grasp the basics is 9-18 months.

        And the “factions” being animals on this title (and that other one) just makes zero positive impression on me. Making the British Navy sharks is just stupid. If anything it detracts from the unity of the rules and setting.

        I’ve said my peace so I should leave it at this. Haven’t played this one, may turn out to love it. But the fact that it’s an asymmetric makes it much less likely I’ll sit down to it.

    • Oh, it depends. I like a hairy asymmetric game now and then!

    • Asymmetry in games is great! I mean, how many real-life conflicts are symmetrical? I can’t see it ever “running its course”: Netrunner, Space Hulk, Scotland Yard, hnefatafl…

      But asymmetry clearly raises the degree of difficulty in learning, teaching, and design. I love A Few Acres of Snow, but it’s a lesson in the the pitfalls of balancing two very different sides.

    • Is there an asymmetry trend? I don’t think there’s an asymmetry trend. Leder Games’ catalog is heavily weighted towards the asymmetric to begin with, so this is business as usual for them, not really a trend or anything. I think you can breathe easily when it comes to the state of the hobby.

  3. A thoughtfully written piece. I loved Kyle’s art on this one, though I agree on your thoughts regarding the Smugglers—the tension between all in 4p game feels good, but the deck being just a hair slimmer than maybe it should be leads to a shallow ending for them. I think an expansion could resolve some of these issues, if one is being considered!

  4. Too bad there’s no discussion of crew here. It’s the most important part of the game imo, and I think it gives the factions way more flexibility than you go into here. I’m still not a huge fan of the game overall, but it feels like that warranted more discussion 🙂

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: