Previewpalooza: Bullet, Intrepid, Pax Viking

This is the sort of article you write when months of a global pandemic have piled up six preview requests and you haven't even played three of them.

Woe is me. I have let too many previews pile up, and now the reaper is coming to collect his due. What follows are three games that I’ve played only in limited fashion — digitally, in prototype, with unfinished components or rules — but certainly enough to get excited about. In other words, it’s fun to be enthusiastic, but be warned that the final game might be totally different from what I actually played.

Cool? Cool. Here we go.

The cast is all female. Should I mention that in the body of text, or is that sexist? Or did I fail to work it in because I'm sexist. I don't even know. It's very late right now.

Making combos on the fly in Bullet.

Bullet♥️

There are two reasons I don’t play shoot ’em ups. First, reflexes. Second, the word “shmups.”

In the process of porting the genre from digital to cardboard, Bullet — no, I’m not going to keep adding that cutesy little heart — makes the whole thing bearable. Crud, more than bearable; this one of the most interesting timed games since Level 99’s own Millennium Blades. That element of speed is at the heart of Bullet: every round, a bunch of, um, bullets are transferred from your bag to your mat. Your goal is to clear as many as possible, using some mix of special actions, combo cards, and a limited pool of energy. Better yet, any bullets you clear will be added to an opponent’s bag next round. Clever players can even glance at rival boards to determine which bullets will be the hardest for them to deal with. That’s currently beyond my level, however, especially since I’ve only been able to play on Tabletop Simulator, which undoubtedly sheds much of the game’s tactility and information flow.

It will surprise no one who’s played a game from Level 99 in the past decade that the cast is a big part of the draw. Each character packs her own signature playstyle. While everybody is interested in arranging combos with the right numbers and colors, Adelheid Beckenbauer transforms bullets into wilds that can fit easily into any situation. Ling-Ling Xiao and Ekolu Kapakahi hunt for specific numbers in order to clear entire swaths of their boards at once. And Mariel Martin even appears on her board in person, darting around to smack bullets out of the air. I’ve only played half of the eight characters so far, but each one has provided a fresh challenge.

Note: There are no dicks in Bullet, but I can't think of a female word that sounds similarly silly without bordering into crass.

Passing discarded bullets to your friends is so perfectly dickish.

In an odd way, Bullet reminds me of The Quacks of Quedlinburg, and not only because they both have draw bags. Like Quacks, every draw is a gamble, but one that’s informed by the situation on your board and by the bullets passed your direction. In Bullet, for example, you’re required to draw all of your chips before the round ends, but you remain free to take actions or make combos in between draws. As your board grows more crowded, it becomes easier to make combos and clear bullets, while also increasing the likelihood that one will slip past your defenses. It’s a sweet spot between risk and reward that makes each draw both gratifying and nerve-wracking.

My one complaint? In its current format, Bullet only plays with four. Given the simultaneous nature of the game, some additional bullet tokens and power-ups would have let it go all the way up to eight without adding any overhead or extra time. That would have made it a no-brainer for larger game nights. Sticking to four pits it against a lot of competition.

Still, it’s a lively one, a rattlesnake of a game that ratchets up the pressure without burning too much gray matter.

Bullet is on Kickstarter for another five days.

 

Reminder: the problem isn't that space is cold, it's that getting rid of heat with nothing to conduct it away is incredibly difficult.

This is what the ISS looks like. I guess?

Intrepid

Disclaimer: Intrepid was originally going to license the Space-Biff! name for its title. Then Jeff Beck examined the contract I sent over. In hindsight, seventy percent royalties was ambitious on my part.

Dice games are about managing chance and chaos. Intrepid is about trying to survive aboard the International Space Station during a disaster. Same thing, really. Both times I’ve played it, the scenario was basically the same as that Sandra Bullock / George Clooney romcom. Thanks to a big explosion, a wall of debris is hurtling across Earth’s orbit and impacting with the ISS every couple hours. To keep the station together long enough for rescue to arrive, the crew will—

Roll tons and tons of dice. More dice than you’re thinking. Big chunky handfuls of the things.

What makes Intrepid interesting, though, is how you massage the outcomes of all those rolls. When I played, everyone was in charge of a different resource like nutrition, power, oxygen, and heat, with fluctuating requirements for each — by which I mean they usually go up rather steeply. As we utilized and repowered modules, we gained access to new tricks. These tricks revolve around the international part of the ISS, because each nation brings their own unique approach to handling the crisis. Some build matches, or unlock temporary rolls, or rotate dice, or plug dice into modules for more dice. There are many approaches, and each brings their own advantages and drawbacks.

JUST LOOK AT MEEE

“Nutrition is very important.” —Me

The resulting game is more than cooperative — it’s collaborative. In the same spirit as the actual ISS, players are encouraged to build upon their own strengths while remaining aware of everybody else’s needs, a sort of “all for one and one for all” that becomes the slender difference between the station’s survival or its untimely decommissioning with all hands aboard. The entire enterprise can seem like a multiplayer solitaire game, but thinking of it that way is guaranteed to benefit nobody. Failing to share enough information and resources caused us to reenter the atmosphere and break apart.

Stern stuff. And also an approach to cooperative games that I can get behind.

Intrepid will appear on Kickstarter on June 23rd.

 

As they do.

The Norse spread across Europe in Pax Viking.

Pax Viking

Pax Viking has been pitched as a gentler introduction to the Pax Series. Which raises two questions: how gentle, and how Pax?

There’s little doubt about the first answer. Teaching a game like Pax Renaissance, Pax Transhumanity, or Pax Pamir can take much longer than a single play. Expect thirty minutes to run through the rules, plus half a play before any of your moves adopt any context, plus another two or three plays before you’re comfortable nudging the board and market to suit your long-term plans. Heck, even having long-term plans means you’ve spent a few hours turning these things over.

By contrast, Pax Viking can be taught in ten minutes. I know this because I’ve done it on no fewer than five occasions. And my pupils performed quite well, thank you.

The sky-high concept is immediately approachable, at least compared to Porfirio Diaz’s reign of Mexico or the global campaign of emancipation — topics that required a few explanatory notes before tossing players into the deep end. Here, you’re Vikings exploring the world, chasing rumors and opportunities, making friends and worshiping gods, and hopefully becoming the biggest darn Viking to ever eschew horns on his or her helmet. The rules are streamlined, although they hit a number of familiar systems: a market for purchasing opportunities, action limits that always seem one point shy of actually achieving your aims, and victory conditions that tend to reward scheming and hanging around in second place until the right time to make your move presents itself.

And his, uh, goddess? I guess?

You get to hang out with this guy.

The bigger contrast is whether it holds together as a continuation of — and an introduction to — the Pax Series. For the most part, yes, although there are some thematic niggles to consider. The good news is principally mechanical. The market is streamlined down to one row from the usual two, but this keeps the action moving at a steady clip. Stalled rounds are rare, and most actions beget immediate effects that alter the state of the board. The game’s most interesting element appears in the form of four special actions that are only available to whichever player holds a majority of a particular type of follower. Having the most Swedish followers, for example, lets you draw from the market and possibly settle for free, while embracing Christianity with gusto can let you convert far-off tokens with ease. These actions provoke major swings but can be difficult to access, encouraging jarls to wrestle for control over multiple domains that might not be directly related to a particular match’s randomized victory conditions.

Thematically, I’m less convinced. Oh, the whole thing coheres well enough. Sailing halfway across the known world to follow up a half-understood rumor feels like a very Norse thing to do. But going a-viking is certainly the least novel setting the series has produced. Unlike the plumbed depths of its sister titles, Pax Viking sticks to paths oft trod, and seems less intrigued with history’s unswept corners. At no point did I feel like I was learning history as I reshaped it.

Then again, this very well could have been another limitation of playing a game in prototype form, because the tiles and victory conditions were still a work in progress. The good news? I can say without reservation that each iteration proved more full-bodied than the one previous. The core concepts remained firm, but each tweak brought it closer to the sort of game I would gladly use to introduce my warier friends to the Pax Series. I’m eager to see what the final version looks like.

The pledge manager for Pax Viking closes in only a few days. Yikes!

 

(If what I’m doing at Space-Biff! is valuable to you in some way, please consider dropping by my Patreon campaign or Ko-fi.)

Posted on June 12, 2020, in Board Game and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. 11 Comments.

  1. Thanks for the words, Dan. Just FYI, every tile in Pax Viking will eventually have flavor text, with even more information listed in the appendix. Whether that conveys the history of the setting any better remains to be seen, but I’ve already learned a lot about Norse history from the jarls and other figures mentioned in the game.

  2. This was timely. Never heard of Intrepid but I already backed Pax Vike and Bullet. Good to hear they’re living up to expectations!

  3. Alexandre Limoges

    Like you, Dan, I really love what Level 99 produces. I am not sure about Bullet, though.I was participating in the KS for a while, playtested a bit on their Discord, then played more on TTS. I find it fun, but it pushes multiplayer solitaire to the extreme of solipsism. You literally have no idea what the other players do on their turn, and when it’s over, you can only see the final state of their board then start a new round. You do send them your bullets their way, but apart from trying to send 3’s and 4’s in bunch, you can’t really affect them at all.

    I don’t know, I guess I still had fun. But I can’t shake this “issue” off.

    Also, maybe it does not matter, but characters are bound to be unbalanced given how asymmetric they are. And Level 99 often likes to throw more characters at you to the expanse of balance, instead of tweaking less characters until they are well-balanced (à la Sirlin). I never really blamed them for that, though, I am not obsessed about balance. But in such a solitaire experience, it could be more of a problem.

    Can confirm Pax Vikings is great fun, though, having played with Andy too.

    • Disagreement on Bullet noted!

      Yeah, Pax Viking is shaping up nicely. Can’t wait to see the finished product.

    • Bullet is only 15 min right? Normally I would be really worried about the solitaire experience also, but if this is in filler game category, it sounds like a fun way to kill a bit or time with a game. I’m sure there is more collective, shared excitement around a table vs online.

      • It’s pretty brisk. I don’t know the exact time — we played on TTS, which is more sluggish than in person — but it moves along at a steady clip. Definitely in the filler category either way. Even online, we were razzing each other and having a good time. That will be easier when we aren’t hogging up a single audio channel!

  4. Awesome preview! I heard about Intrepid On a Tim Fowers Live stream. Him and Jeff talked about it very enthusiastically. This preview has really got me hyped for the game! I had no idea the KS was launching for it so soon. So far I’ve enjoyed HardBack and Getaway Drover so I have full confidence in Jeff Beck delivering. It also seems this may be the heaviest game he has designed to the date (based on very early BGG complexity ratings)?

    I also played Bullet on TTS a few times. The game is very fun and teaching it is not too difficult even with the asymmetrical characters. Despite the experience being pretty solitaire, my 1v1 games led to some satisfying trash talking opportunities.

    • Intrepid is definitely heavier than Hardback and Getaway Driver, although in some ways it’s more intuitive than the latter game. One nice detail is that different nations have varying difficulty levels, so struggling players can select something simpler.

  5. Thanks Dan, I invested in Bullet, I’ll let you know how that’s working for me. 🦌

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: