Looney Pyramids, Part Two: Ice Duo

I want my life story illustrated in this style.

When last we looked at Andrew Looney’s latest production of his pyramid system, the results were spotty. Of the four games included in the introductory Nomids set, only one put the system to good use. The rest relegated their pyramids to glorified counters. Better to heed the advice of Sir Benjamin Wyatt: “It’s all about the ‘mids.”

How does the second set fare? Fifty-fifty. But to put that in context, that’s double the score!

Presumably I could use these to play any number of other games. But this series must stick to the offerings of each box, or I'm doomed.

At least Ice Dice uses a whole lot of ‘mids.

Ice Dice

2 players. Tagline: push-your-luck with pyramids.

There’s a good chance you’ve played something like Ice Dice, which is both a statement on its ease of entry and its lack of appeal. It’s familiar, but like a brother-in-law who doesn’t understand that staying over at your place the week between Christmas and New Year’s isn’t anyone’s idea of a refreshing holiday vacation.

It works like this. On your turn, you roll its pair of dice. These assign a color and a size that correspond to the pyramids in the bank, sometimes with a bit of wiggle room as to what exactly you’re allowed to claim. Don’t grab that ‘mid just yet. Your selected pyramid goes in the middle of the table. Now you choose: take the pyramid or roll again. If you roll a different color, you add another pyramid to the middle and make the game’s sole decision all over again. If you roll the same, everything you’ve earned this turn is lost back to the bank. As the pot grows larger, so too does the temptation to push onward or pull out.

That binary decision repeats until one player completes two sets of three like-colored pyramids. There’s some stealing once the bank runs low, and a smidgen of strategy whenever a wild is rolled, but that’s some watery broth no matter how many bouillon cubes you slide into the pot. The problem isn’t the push-or-bust gameplay. Rather, it’s that heaps of other games have done the same thing with more style despite not featuring a single pyramid. And it doesn’t help that this is yet another entry in Looney’s pyramid series that doesn’t leverage its titular system.

Sheesh, finally.

Ah, trees and nests. Here we go.

Twin Win

2 players. Tagline: AT LAST. PYRAMIDS.

I need to put my enthusiasm for Twin Win into context. Tucked into each of this series’ four boxes is an identical pamphlet explaining the Looney Pyramid system. Three sizes of pyramids, with identifying pips for the sizing-impaired. Two orientations, upright or flat. And three groupings: the trio, three pyramids of the same color; nests, when smaller pyramids disappear underneath larger pyramids so that only the largest is visible; and trees, when small pyramids pile atop larger ones until they resemble cartoon pines.

Twin Win is the first entry to actually utilize those last two groupings. Even better, nests and trees are central to every decision you’ll make. Even better than that, Twin Win also includes bluffing.

Imagine this. As Twin Win begins, there are five trees, each consisting of three different sizes and colors of pyramids. A single turn sees you moving two pyramids, either traveling clockwise around the board or using the middle space as a shortcut. Sometimes you’ll stack a small pyramid on top of a larger one, making futuristic high rises across the game’s ever-changing skyline. Other times larger pyramids will enfold smaller ones, hiding them from view. Or sometimes both will happen within the same stack, large pyramids atop small atop large atop small.

There’s a purpose to all this movement. Two purposes. Four, really, but only two of them are yours. A pair of objective cards, drawn at random during setup, and indicating which three pyramids of the same color you’re endeavoring to bring into conjunction. But more than merely putting them in proximity, it’s your task to secure their proper arrangement, whether as a nest or a tree.

Aaannnd... now my opponent can win in one move. Superb job, Dan.

Planning one million moves in advance.

Meanwhile, your opponent is doing the same. And since there’s no limitation on which pieces they can move, it behooves you to keep them from figuring out which arrangement you’re going for. Hence some light bluffing. Or bluffing like you’re bluffing, but you’re not bluffing. Or bluffing toward one of your colors while moving the other color only sporadically. Or not bluffing at all, and then wondering why your jerk opponent keeps winning so easily.

What’s so great about Twin Win isn’t only that it’s a genuine introduction to the pyramid system — although it is that. At last, it makes sense why all these pyramids are translucent. You can see the pyramids that might otherwise go overlooked! At last, it’s easy to see why Looney describes his ‘mids as a deck of cards. Because in addition to the Go Fish of the other titles, here’s a game worthy of buying a pack! But like I said, Twin Win isn’t only that. It’s also a clever spatial puzzle in its own right. What initially looks impossible soon becomes possible, then likely, then impossible again when your opponent happens to move that small red pyramid you needed. Was that their intention? Have they figured you out? Or are they going for the same color but in a different arrangement? The whole thing has a compelling edge, as thinky as it is compact.

Or maybe I’m just mesmerized by the ‘mids. Entirely possible. But after the letdown of the first few entries, it feels good to finally see what Looney Pyramids are all about.

 

(If what I’m doing at Space-Biff! is valuable to you in some way, please consider dropping by my Patreon campaign or Ko-fi.)

Posted on January 23, 2021, in Board Game and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. 7 Comments.

  1. Congratulations! You’re one of the very few game reviewers that actually tells us how many players the game accommodates.

  2. Bro….give it a rest.

  3. So happy to see Looney Pyramids getting the Space Biff treatment. After hearing about them for so long I decided to go in on the Quartet Kickstarter, picking up three of the prepackaged boxes (I skipped Nomids) with a duplicate Homeworlds so I could try Zendo with more variety, plus a few extras from Looney Labs to enable additional games. They just arrived.

    I’ve never been particularly attracted to abstracts but so many of Looney’s games have raves and in particular Zendo and Homeworld stick out on very different ends of the spectrum. The pre-packaging of specific games lowers the mental friction of playing (I feel like configurable games – ‘systems’ and games with lots of expansions – often discourage play through the overhead/anxiety of too much choice). And I won’t lie – the aesthetics (the gorgeous pieces and the graphic design) are a draw. So keep ’em coming!!!

    Glad you found Twin Win intriguing. Doesn’t seem like a game my wife would ever want to play but I may be able to scale it down in a couple of years for my daughter (she’s not yet 4) and interestingly, on BGG it’s narrowly rated “best at 3” – that’s rare enough to be quite handy. Speaking of which – when you cross post to BGG don’t forget the separate Twin Win entry from when it was published in Icehouse.

    Thanks again for the great reviews!

    -vas

    • Thanks for the input, vas! In addition to these sets, I really need to play Zendo. I have the cards from Looney Labs, so I may tackle that when this current series wraps up.

      (And since you mention the system’s appearance, Martian Chess looks incredible, by the way. I love just looking at it.)

      • Oh yeah – looking forward to that. Do you have the standard red or the KS silver? I assume the included board is just cardboard but it looks like the kind of game you’d see setup on an officer’s coffee table in Star Trek.

      • I couldn’t help but get the silver. The board isn’t anything special, but those silver pyramids definitely make the Star Trek comparison apt.

  1. Pingback: Looney Pyramids, Part Three: Martian Chess | SPACE-BIFF!

Leave a Reply to Scott Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

<span>%d</span> bloggers like this: